I was getting upset about the Americanisation of Britain
this week after someone of a similar background to my own misspelled the medical
term anaemic in the American way, ‘anemic’.
This sort of thing seems to be happening at an alarming rate. As part of the fallout from the same
incident, it was even mentioned that I was 'stuck in the Dark Ages' and that
this is progress don't you know; that
we ought to bring Britain kicking and screaming into the future, with this
young, hip superpower by our side.
He doesn't look so young and hip to me. |
America is almost universally supposed to be a young, forward-thinking
country, lacking our medieval vestiges because in the Middle Ages it wasn’t
even there yet. It was only in 1776 that
the legal separation of the Thirteen Colonies from Great Britain occurred, so
the little darlings are only 236 years old.
To hell with Gangnam; let's celebrate it George Washington style and
have a double ration of rum. (Take it
from me, Washington wasn’t the first British colonel to go mad in the
wilderness, and he certainly won’t be the last.)
However, it has recently come to my attention that America
is lying about his age.
If you ignore the Vikings, which I admit is often a hard
thing to do around my house, John Cabot, the Anglo-Italian navigator and
explorer, discovered North America on 24 June 1497 under the commission of Henry VII of England.
Most people
forget this happened. True, Cabot did
not advance 'beyond the shooting distance of a crossbow', made no contact with
the natives, took on fresh water, raised the Venetian and Papal banners,
claimed the land for the King of England (whilst, of course, recognising the religious authority of the Roman
Catholic Church – Protestantism would not get invented for another twenty years)
and buggered off to explore the coast on his way home to Bristol.
Then, he
was horribly overshadowed by someone else.
I'd imagine you've all
heard of Christopher Columbus, who completed four round-trip voyages between
Spain and the Western Hemisphere between 1492 and 1503 under the sponsorship of
the Crown of Castile. During his first
voyage in 1492, Colón (as his
name was actually spelled) landed in
the Bahamas archipelago, and then over the course of three more voyages he
visited the Greater and Lesser Antilles, the Caribbean coast of Venezuela, and
Central America, claiming them for the Spanish Empire.
Apparently, for the emerging United States, John Cabot’s English and
(posthumously) Canadian connections made him a poor national hero, and so the
veneration of Columbus in America took wing from colonial times onwards. His adoption as a founding figure of New
World nations and the use of the word 'Columbia', or even simply 'Columbus',
spread rapidly after the American Revolution.
Numerous cities, towns, counties, streets and plazas are named after
him. He was a candidate for sainthood in
1866, and on the 400th anniversary of his first arrival in the Americas, in
1892, monuments to Columbus were erected throughout the United States and Latin
America.
But Cabot's got the hero stance and EVERYTHING. |
Poor show, America.
How can you claim to be a Young Country when you are praising the chap
who found your bottom and Colón-ised it in the late 1400s?
So, perhaps America isn't really that young, and the 1490s still certainly qualify as the Middle
Ages round my neck of the woods. But
it's still ‘forward-thinking’, surely?
Well…
Because the typical American lived on an isolated farmstead
as recently as 1910, most American dialects changed far more slowly than
English did in Britain, which was densely urbanised by 1850. One of the effects of this is that many words,
spellings, and punctuation marks now in use in the USA were actually fairly
normal for the England of the early 1700s (but not since).
Yea, Verily! |
Before 1755, most people used future 'British', future
'American', and future 'incorrect' spellings interchangeably – or according to
what language the word was borrowed from, i.e. '-our' for French and '-or' for
Latin. But after Dr Johnson came down
firmly on the side of '-our' for all such words, and his US counterpart Noah
Webster equally firmly on the side of '-or', this became a new type of national
distinction, where before it had just been academic or random. The spellings 'honor' and 'realize' and the
like were commonly used in England in the 17th century when the majority of the
Thirteen Colonies were founded.
Today, opinions in Britain, the Commonwealth, and the EU
vary on whether '-ize' and '-yze' endings are American Imperialism, or just
very, very old-fashioned. But of course,
they are both. The University of Oxford (in contrast even to
Cambridge) does not help the situation, in that it supports the ancient
spellings out of respect for ancientness; and its popular dictionaries can be
pointed to by Americans to 'prove' that their preferred i.e. 17th-century
spelling is more right than ours even in our own country.
It is clearly time for Oxford to put a sock in it and
realise that they should spell realise realise.
Even as I write this on my computer, I am faced by those
damned red squiggly lines under 'recognising' and 'realise', even though I set
it to ‘UK-English’ some time ago. Even
Mr Gates's famous software is subliminally brainwashing us (but I won't tell
him that, right now, I've also got a squiggly line under 'honor'. Surely we can’t all be wrong?).
Mind you, as a personal favour, if he could stop
automatically correcting the word 'wellies' to 'willies', I'd be most appreciative.
While we’re on the subject of language, here's another thing
I'd like to point out to our younger brother.
The 'county sheriff' riding down the 'highway' with his 'posse' – short
for the Latin posse comitatus, 'power
of the count(y)' – was a common occurrence in England in the Middle Ages. The US is rather special for the persistence
into recent times of highways and posses, as well as county sheriffs with the
equivalent power, and equivalent bad attitude, of our semi-legendary
twelfth-century Sheriff of Nottingham.
Speaking of posses and such, England last hanged a man in
1964 and abolished hanging in 1969. The
US, meanwhile, is seemingly not even capable of abolishing it, due to that
country's bizarre patchwork of more than fifty different competing systems of
law, education, and taxation: an arrangement that makes Mr Colón’s medieval Italy look tightly
organised in comparison. And as to this
'Commander-in-Chief' business, the British head of state last commanded an army
in war in 1743 or possibly 1746, and (without meaning any disrespect to Their
Majesties) our win/loss ratio has been improving steadily ever since.
At best, America is not younger, but about the same age: we
remain strangely susceptible to Patty Duke
Show-like visions of the Atlantic Alliance, England and America as each
other’s Bizarro World, driving down opposite sides of the road but in the same
direction forever, my Laurel to their Hardy, their Heckle to my Jeckle.
But facts are facts. Our flag and name 'United Kingdom' only date
back to New Year's Day 1801, making us younger than America by 24 years, 5
months, and 28 days.We're also much, much cuter. |